vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. (BHM) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.9M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.3× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -50.1%, a 114.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 35.9%). Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.4M vs $8.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 30.1%).
Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and operates a portfolio of high-quality single-family rental residential properties. It caters to middle-market renters across high-growth suburban markets, prioritizing regions with strong demographic fundamentals and sustained rental housing demand.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
BHM vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.9M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-9.5M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -48.8% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -50.1% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.9% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.9% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.9M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -48.8% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.8% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -41.3% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.4% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -50.1% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -60.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.7% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.8% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -41.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.4% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.94 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.66 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.67 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.65 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.27 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $169.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $428.4M | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $128.7M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.33× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.3M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $415.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $338.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $373.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $120.2M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $128.7M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.3M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.1M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.1M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.9M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.5M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.5M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.1M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.3M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.2M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $967.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $800.8M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $756.2M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $727.4M | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.33× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.16× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.50× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.45× | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.69× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.8M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.4M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 55.0% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 91.8% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $951.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-253.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-601.0K | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-654.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-630.0K | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 55.0% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.7% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.2% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.6% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 91.8% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHM
| Residential Communities Segment | $11.4M | 61% |
| Scattered Single Family Homes Segment | $7.5M | 39% |
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.
