vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and JFrog Ltd (FROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JFrog Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($145.3M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.7× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -10.5%, a 45.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JFrog Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.2% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $49.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 20.4%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
JFrog Ltd is a global DevOps technology provider that delivers end-to-end software release, artifact management, and security solutions. It serves clients across tech, finance, retail, and manufacturing sectors, helping teams streamline development and delivery workflows for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructure.
BHRB vs FROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $145.3M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-15.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | -14.7% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | 34.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $145.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $136.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $127.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $122.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $116.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $109.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $103.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 79.5% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | -14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -18.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -15.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $704.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $887.4M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $704.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $651.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $563.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $522.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $467.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $591.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $579.6M |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $887.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $859.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $826.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $800.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $773.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $756.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $721.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $707.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $997.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $50.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $49.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | 34.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $142.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $48.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
