vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.1M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.2× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -1.4%, a 36.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.9% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
BHRB vs GDYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $104.1M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 61.7% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | -150.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $104.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $100.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $100.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $83.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $306.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $-817.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 61.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $327.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $530.1M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $605.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $327.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $342.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $338.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $334.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $530.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $542.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $537.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $532.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $517.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $517.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $400.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $388.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $612.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $613.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $608.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $590.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $592.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $477.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $443.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $10.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | 32.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | 5.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 2.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | 3.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
