vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and IMAX CORP (IMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.4× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs 0.5%, a 34.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 25.8%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
BHRB vs IMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $125.2M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | -88.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $86.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $89.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $79.1M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $151.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $337.9M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $894.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $143.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $320.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $299.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $289.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $267.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $894.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $889.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $868.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $848.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $830.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $827.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $824.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | 46.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $118.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | -15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | 46.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | -3.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
