vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMAX CORP (IMAX) and El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $123.5M, roughly 1.0× El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.). El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 0.5%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 8.1%). IMAX CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.0M vs $5.1M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 3.1%).
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
IMAX vs LOCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $125.2M | $123.5M |
| Net Profit | $637.0K | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.1% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.0% | 9.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $125.2M | $123.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.7M | $121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $125.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.7M | $114.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $120.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $122.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $637.0K | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.2M | $6.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $51.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $337.9M | $291.1M |
| Total Assets | $894.0M | $606.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.0M |
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $291.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $349.5M | $282.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $320.4M | $274.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.5M | $265.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.4M | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.2M | $248.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | $256.3M |
| Q4 25 | $894.0M | $606.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.6M | $602.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6M | $596.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $848.3M | $590.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $830.4M | $592.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $847.6M | $590.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.4M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $824.1M | $598.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.31× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.4M | $13.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $28.0M | $5.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.3% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 46.11× | 2.13× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $118.9M | $25.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.4M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.5M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.1M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 46.11× | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.27× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.99× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.78× | 2.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.35× | 1.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
LOCO
| Services | $102.4M | 83% |
| Franchise | $13.0M | 11% |
| Franchise Advertising Fee | $8.1M | 7% |
