vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.6× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs 25.2%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.9% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
BHRB vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
