vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.5M vs $62.2M, roughly 1.4× Ouster, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $-37.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 54.8%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
BHRB vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | -93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -99.5% |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | -88.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -91.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.69 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $187.8M |
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.3M | $167.2M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $309.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $317.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -81.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | -27.4% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
