vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) and CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE (CM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1B vs $5.0B, roughly 1.2× Baidu, Inc.). CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE runs the higher net margin — 36.9% vs 6.0%, a 31.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Baidu, Inc. is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in Internet services and artificial intelligence. It holds a dominant position in China's search engine market, and provides a wide variety of other internet services such as Baidu App, Baidu Baike, iQIYI, and Baidu Tieba.
The Imperial Bank of Canada was a Canadian bank that operated from 1873 to 1961. In 1961, Imperial merged with the Canadian Bank of Commerce to become the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
BIDU vs CM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0B | $6.1B |
| Net Profit | $300.0M | $2.3B |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 36.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.53 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $300.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $768.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -48.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.76 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.84 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.95 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.5B | $8.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $38.1B | $47.9B |
| Total Assets | $64.2B | $826.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $10.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $47.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6B | $45.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.8B | $45.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $826.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4B | $804.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.9B | $795.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | $-1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.08× | -0.69× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3B | $667.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.69× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.26× | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.88× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIDU
| Legacy Business | $1.8B | 35% |
| Baidu Core AI-powered Business | $1.6B | 32% |
| Other | $1.3B | 26% |
| Others | $357.5M | 7% |
CM
Segment breakdown not available.
