vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Biogen (BIIB) and EchoStar CORP (SATS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EchoStar CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.5× Biogen). Biogen runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs -31.8%, a 44.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Biogen posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs -4.3%). Biogen produced more free cash flow last quarter ($594.3M vs $-583.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Biogen's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Biogen Inc. is an American multinational biotechnology company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States specializing in the treatment of neurological diseases. The company's primary products are dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), diroximel fumarate (Vumerity), interferon beta-1a (AVONEX), peginterferon beta-1a (Plegridy), and natalizumab (Tysabri), all for the treatment of multiple sclerosis ; nusinersen (Spinraza) for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy ; omaveloxolone (Skyclarys) for ...
TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp. is a case stretching from 2004 to 2011, which took place in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. TiVo Inc. sued EchoStar Corp. claiming patent infringement of a DVR technology. The issues addressed during litigation included patent infringement, wording of injunctions, infringing product redesign, contempt of court orders, and contempt sanctions. Ultimately, the court held...
BIIB vs SATS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $319.5M | $-1.2B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -20.5% |
| Net Margin | 12.9% | -31.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.0% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.8% | -460.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.15 | $-4.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $319.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-48.9M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.5M | $-12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $634.8M | $-306.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.5M | $-202.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $266.7M | $335.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.5M | $-141.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $583.6M | $-205.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | -20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | -460.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.1% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | -1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | -353.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.7% | -5.2% |
| Q1 26 | $2.15 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | $-4.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.17 | $-44.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.33 | $-1.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.64 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.82 | $1.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.66 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $-0.76 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.4B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $18.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.7B | $5.8B |
| Total Assets | $29.5B | $43.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $674.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $520.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $25.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $25.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | $25.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6B | $19.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $20.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7B | $20.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4B | $19.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9B | $19.6B |
| Q1 26 | $29.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.4B | $43.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2B | $45.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.3B | $59.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0B | $60.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0B | $60.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.3B | $57.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8B | $55.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.34× | 3.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.36× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 1.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.40× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-425.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $594.3M | $-583.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | -15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.4B | $-1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $511.9M | $-425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.3M | $206.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $760.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.6M | $276.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $625.8M | $479.7M |
| Q1 26 | $594.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $468.0M | $-583.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $-144.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.3M | $-285.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.2M | $-51.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $721.6M | $-298.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $900.6M | $-57.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.3M | $132.4M |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.4% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.85× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIIB
| Product revenue, net | $1.8B | 71% |
| Royalty revenue on sales of OCREVUS | $317.2M | 13% |
| Contract manufacturing, royalty and other revenue | $246.9M | 10% |
| Biogen's share of pre-tax profits in the U.S. for RITUXAN, GAZYVA and LUNSUMIO | $94.7M | 4% |
| Alzheimer's collaboration Revenue | $59.5M | 2% |
| Other revenue from anti-CD20 therapeutic programs | $7.2M | 0% |
SATS
| Pay Tv | $2.4B | 62% |
| Wireless Services And Related Revenue | $846.5M | 22% |
| Equipment Sales And Other Revenue | $346.5M | 9% |
| Broadband And Satellite Services And Other Revenue | $264.1M | 7% |
