vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EchoStar CORP (SATS) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

EchoStar CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $1.7B, roughly 2.2× Take-Two Interactive). Take-Two Interactive runs the higher net margin — -5.5% vs -31.8%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs -4.3%). Take-Two Interactive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($236.2M vs $-583.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -2.8%).

TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp. is a case stretching from 2004 to 2011, which took place in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. TiVo Inc. sued EchoStar Corp. claiming patent infringement of a DVR technology. The issues addressed during litigation included patent infringement, wording of injunctions, infringing product redesign, contempt of court orders, and contempt sanctions. Ultimately, the court held...

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.

SATS vs TTWO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SATS
SATS
2.2× larger
SATS
$3.8B
$1.7B
TTWO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TTWO
TTWO
+29.3% gap
TTWO
24.9%
-4.3%
SATS
Higher net margin
TTWO
TTWO
26.3% more per $
TTWO
-5.5%
-31.8%
SATS
More free cash flow
TTWO
TTWO
$819.6M more FCF
TTWO
$236.2M
$-583.4M
SATS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TTWO
TTWO
Annualised
TTWO
10.2%
-2.8%
SATS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Revenue
$3.8B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$-1.2B
$-92.9M
Gross Margin
55.7%
Operating Margin
-20.5%
-2.3%
Net Margin
-31.8%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
-4.3%
24.9%
Net Profit YoY
-460.1%
25.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-4.27
$-0.50

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$3.8B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$3.9B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$3.9B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$4.0B
$1.3B
Q1 24
$4.0B
$1.4B
Net Profit
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$-1.2B
$-92.9M
Q3 25
$-12.8B
$-133.9M
Q2 25
$-306.1M
$-11.9M
Q1 25
$-202.7M
$-3.7B
Q4 24
$335.2M
$-125.2M
Q3 24
$-141.8M
$-365.5M
Q2 24
$-205.6M
$-262.0M
Q1 24
$-107.4M
$-2.9B
Gross Margin
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
55.7%
Q3 25
55.3%
Q2 25
62.8%
Q1 25
50.8%
Q4 24
55.9%
Q3 24
53.8%
Q2 24
57.6%
Q1 24
33.5%
Operating Margin
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
-20.5%
-2.3%
Q3 25
-460.5%
-5.5%
Q2 25
-5.7%
1.4%
Q1 25
-2.3%
-238.7%
Q4 24
-1.6%
-9.7%
Q3 24
-4.1%
-22.0%
Q2 24
-1.7%
-13.8%
Q1 24
-0.4%
-193.9%
Net Margin
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
-31.8%
-5.5%
Q3 25
-353.6%
-7.5%
Q2 25
-8.2%
-0.8%
Q1 25
-5.2%
-235.5%
Q4 24
8.5%
-9.2%
Q3 24
-3.6%
-27.0%
Q2 24
-5.2%
-19.6%
Q1 24
-2.7%
-207.4%
EPS (diluted)
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$-4.27
$-0.50
Q3 25
$-44.37
$-0.73
Q2 25
$-1.06
$-0.07
Q1 25
$-0.71
$-21.27
Q4 24
$1.24
$-0.71
Q3 24
$-0.52
$-2.08
Q2 24
$-0.76
$-1.52
Q1 24
$-0.40
$-17.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$3.0B
$2.4B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$18.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.8B
$3.5B
Total Assets
$43.0B
$10.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$3.0B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$2.1B
Q2 25
$4.3B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$5.1B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$5.5B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$674.4M
$879.6M
Q2 24
$520.6M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$766.4M
$776.0M
Total Debt
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$18.7B
Q3 25
$21.8B
Q2 25
$25.4B
Q1 25
$25.3B
Q4 24
$25.7B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$951.0M
Stockholders' Equity
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$5.8B
$3.5B
Q3 25
$7.0B
$3.4B
Q2 25
$19.7B
$3.5B
Q1 25
$20.0B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$20.2B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$19.4B
$5.8B
Q2 24
$19.6B
$6.0B
Q1 24
$19.8B
$5.7B
Total Assets
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$43.0B
$10.0B
Q3 25
$45.3B
$10.1B
Q2 25
$59.9B
$9.7B
Q1 25
$60.6B
$9.2B
Q4 24
$60.9B
$12.7B
Q3 24
$57.5B
$13.1B
Q2 24
$55.3B
$12.9B
Q1 24
$55.6B
$12.2B
Debt / Equity
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
3.24×
Q3 25
3.13×
Q2 25
1.29×
Q1 25
1.27×
Q4 24
1.27×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.05×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-425.3M
$305.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-583.4M
$236.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-15.4%
13.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.2%
4.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.1B
$487.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$-425.3M
$305.2M
Q3 25
$111.7M
$128.4M
Q2 25
$7.5M
$-44.7M
Q1 25
$206.8M
$279.0M
Q4 24
$45.6M
$-4.8M
Q3 24
$276.2M
$-128.4M
Q2 24
$479.7M
$-191.0M
Q1 24
$451.3M
$-8.9M
Free Cash Flow
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$-583.4M
$236.2M
Q3 25
$-144.4M
$96.5M
Q2 25
$-285.7M
$-69.8M
Q1 25
$-51.7M
$224.9M
Q4 24
$-298.7M
$-48.2M
Q3 24
$-57.5M
$-165.2M
Q2 24
$132.4M
$-226.1M
Q1 24
$-68.4M
$-55.1M
FCF Margin
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
-15.4%
13.9%
Q3 25
-4.0%
5.4%
Q2 25
-7.7%
-4.6%
Q1 25
-1.3%
14.2%
Q4 24
-7.5%
-3.5%
Q3 24
-1.5%
-12.2%
Q2 24
3.3%
-16.9%
Q1 24
-1.7%
-3.9%
Capex Intensity
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
4.2%
4.1%
Q3 25
7.1%
1.8%
Q2 25
7.9%
1.7%
Q1 25
6.7%
3.4%
Q4 24
8.7%
3.2%
Q3 24
8.6%
2.7%
Q2 24
8.8%
2.6%
Q1 24
12.9%
3.3%
Cash Conversion
SATS
SATS
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.14×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SATS
SATS

Pay Tv$2.4B62%
Wireless Services And Related Revenue$846.5M22%
Equipment Sales And Other Revenue$346.5M9%
Broadband And Satellite Services And Other Revenue$264.1M7%

TTWO
TTWO

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons