vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BILL Holdings, Inc. (BILL) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $414.7M, roughly 1.3× BILL Holdings, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -0.6%, a 30.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BILL Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.4% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, BILL Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.3% CAGR vs 5.6%).

BILL Holdings, Inc. is an American company based in San Jose, California, that provides automated, cloud-based software for financial operations for small businesses in the United States. A white-labeled, end-to-end payments automation platform, Bill.com Connect is offered to financial institutions as part of their single sign-on online business banking ecosystem.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

BILL vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.3× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$414.7M
BILL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BILL
BILL
+10.4% gap
BILL
14.4%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
30.4% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-0.6%
BILL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BILL
BILL
Annualised
BILL
13.3%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$414.7M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$-2.6M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
79.8%
Operating Margin
-4.4%
37.2%
Net Margin
-0.6%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
14.4%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-107.7%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.03
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$414.7M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$395.7M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$383.3M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$358.2M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$362.6M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$358.4M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$343.7M
$500.2M
Net Profit
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$-2.6M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$-3.0M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$-7.1M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$-11.6M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$33.5M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$8.9M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$7.6M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
79.8%
Q3 25
80.5%
Q2 25
80.8%
Q1 25
81.2%
Q4 24
81.6%
Q3 24
82.0%
Q2 24
81.0%
Operating Margin
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
-4.4%
36.4%
Q3 25
-5.2%
34.9%
Q2 25
-5.8%
39.2%
Q1 25
-8.1%
33.6%
Q4 24
-6.0%
31.7%
Q3 24
-2.1%
33.7%
Q2 24
-6.5%
32.1%
Net Margin
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
-0.6%
27.9%
Q3 25
-0.7%
25.7%
Q2 25
-1.8%
31.0%
Q1 25
-3.2%
24.8%
Q4 24
9.3%
31.6%
Q3 24
2.5%
26.8%
Q2 24
2.2%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-0.03
Q3 25
$-0.03
Q2 25
$0.02
Q1 25
$-0.11
Q4 24
$-0.06
Q3 24
$0.08
Q2 24
$0.37

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.8B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$10.1B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.48×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.1B
$211.6M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$159.3M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$226.6M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$131.3M
Q4 24
$1.6B
$688.6M
Q3 24
$853.5M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$985.9M
$126.4M
Total Debt
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.8B
$7.7B
Q3 25
$1.9B
Q2 25
$1.7B
Q1 25
$1.7B
Q4 24
$1.7B
$8.0B
Q3 24
$914.8M
Q2 24
$914.0M
Stockholders' Equity
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$3.8B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$3.9B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$3.9B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$3.8B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$4.1B
$10.6B
Total Assets
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$10.1B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$10.2B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$10.1B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$9.6B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$9.7B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$9.0B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$9.2B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.48×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.48×
Q2 25
0.44×
Q1 25
0.43×
Q4 24
0.44×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.23×
Q2 24
0.22×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$105.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$103.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
25.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$378.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$105.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$96.9M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$83.8M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$99.5M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$78.7M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$88.6M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$78.6M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$103.8M
Q3 25
$95.6M
Q2 25
$81.0M
Q1 25
$98.4M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$78.3M
Q3 24
$88.6M
Q2 24
$78.4M
FCF Margin
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
25.0%
Q3 25
24.1%
Q2 25
21.1%
Q1 25
27.5%
38.3%
Q4 24
21.6%
Q3 24
24.7%
Q2 24
22.8%
Capex Intensity
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.4%
0.0%
Q3 25
0.3%
0.0%
Q2 25
0.7%
0.0%
Q1 25
0.3%
3.4%
Q4 24
0.1%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.1%
Cash Conversion
BILL
BILL
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
2.35×
1.44×
Q3 24
9.94×
2.18×
Q2 24
10.35×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BILL
BILL

Accounts Payable And Accounts Receivable Solutions$185.9M45%
Spend And Expense Interchange Revenue$166.5M40%
Interest On Funds Held For Customers$39.5M10%
Embedded And Other Solutions$22.8M5%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons