vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC. (BIO) and QIAGEN N.V. (QGEN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. is an American developer and manufacturer of specialized technological products for the life science research and clinical diagnostics markets. The company was founded in 1952 in Berkeley, California, by husband and wife team David and Alice Schwartz, both graduates of the University of California, Berkeley. Bio-Rad is based in Hercules, California, and has operations worldwide.
QIAGEN N.V. is a German-founded multinational provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics, applied testing, academic research, and pharmaceutical research. The company operates in more than 35 offices in over 25 countries. QIAGEN N.V., the global corporate headquarter of the QIAGEN group, is located in Venlo, The Netherlands. The main operative headquarters are located in Hilden, Germany. European, American, Chinese, and Asian-Pacific regional headquarters are located ...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $693.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $651.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $585.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $667.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $610.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $720.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-341.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-715.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $653.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $383.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -107.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 100.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -339.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.59 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.67 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.89 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.34 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-76.26 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.45 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
