vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) and Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fathom Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($90.6M vs $77.6M, roughly 1.2× Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.). Fathom Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.4% vs -9.6%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fathom Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.2% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Fathom Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.4% CAGR vs -8.4%).
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
Fathom Holdings Inc. is a US-based real estate technology and services enterprise. It provides end-to-end solutions for real estate agents, brokers, and consumers, including digital transaction management tools, mortgage services, title insurance, and residential property brokerage services, covering most regional markets across the United States.
BIOX vs FTHM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.6M | $90.6M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $-6.7M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -5.2% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | -7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.8% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.2% | -7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.6M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $93.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $91.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.3M | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $89.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.0M | $70.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $605.2K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.8M | $-5.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | -8.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $-0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $5.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $288.3M | $37.4M |
| Total Assets | $734.9M | $78.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.4M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.3M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.0M | $43.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.3M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $348.5M | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $734.9M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $80.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $798.2M | $81.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.2M | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.3M | $80.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.1M | $78.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $-20.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-20.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -22.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-29.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $-330.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $-947.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-364.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-948.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.78× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIOX
Segment breakdown not available.
FTHM
| Real Estate Brokerage | $84.9M | 94% |
| Mortgage Segment | $3.4M | 4% |
| Other | $2.3M | 3% |
