vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($77.6M vs $51.0M, roughly 1.5× LandBridge Co LLC). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 35.0% vs -9.6%, a 44.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.0% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (40.2% CAGR vs -8.4%).
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
BIOX vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.6M | $51.0M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $17.9M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 57.2% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | 35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.8% | 16.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.2% | 15.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.6M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.3M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $605.2K | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-57.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -197.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -222.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $29.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $433.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $288.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $734.9M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $433.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $360.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.3M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.0M | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.3M | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $296.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $734.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $798.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.3M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $710.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $41.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $40.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 80.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $232.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $40.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.85× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIOX
Segment breakdown not available.
LB
| Other | $14.2M | 28% |
| Easements and other surface-related revenues | $11.6M | 23% |
| Surface use royalties - related party | $11.0M | 22% |
| Resource sales | $5.2M | 10% |
| Resource royalties | $4.3M | 8% |
| Easements and other surface-related revenues - related party | $3.2M | 6% |
| Resource royalties - related party | $1.3M | 2% |
| Resource sales - related party | $205.0K | 0% |
