vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $77.6M, roughly 1.8× Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.). Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. runs the higher net margin — -9.6% vs -31.4%, a 21.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -8.4%).
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
BIOX vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.6M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.8% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.2% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.6M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.3M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $605.2K | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $288.3M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $734.9M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $734.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $798.2M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.2M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.3M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
