vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($77.6M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.5× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. runs the higher net margin — -9.6% vs -106.3%, a 96.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.4% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -8.4%).
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
BIOX vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.6M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -9.6% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.8% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.2% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $77.6M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.8M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.3M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.0M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $140.2M | $50.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $605.2K | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.2M | $9.3M |
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 36.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 12.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.9% | 18.3% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.00 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $288.3M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $734.9M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $24.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $873.4M |
| Q3 25 | $288.3M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.0M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.3M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $348.5M | $484.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $335.3M | $483.0M |
| Q3 25 | $734.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $798.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $836.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | $819.5M | $1.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $21.1M | $18.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.85× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.78× | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 23 | 17.05× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
