vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP) and Raymond James Financial (RJF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $3.9B, roughly 1.4× Raymond James Financial). Raymond James Financial runs the higher net margin — 14.1% vs 4.6%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Raymond James Financial posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 5.7%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Raymond James Financial, Inc. is an American multinational independent investment bank and financial services company providing financial services to individuals, corporations, and municipalities through its subsidiary companies that engage primarily in investment and financial planning, in addition to investment banking and asset management. The company is headquartered in St. Petersburg, Florida.
BIP vs RJF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $3.9B |
| Net Profit | $252.0M | $544.0M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 14.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 13.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.0% | 10.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $2.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $544.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $563.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $604.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.0M | $436.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $495.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $602.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.0M | $492.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 17.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.83 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.79 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $2.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3B | $5.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.6B | $52.0M |
| Total Assets | $108.7B | $91.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.6B | $12.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.1B | $11.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $91.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $88.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7B | $84.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $82.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.9B | $80.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $796.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $691.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $830.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $711.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-56.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $752.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $634.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $789.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $460.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $655.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.72× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.74× | 1.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIP
Segment breakdown not available.
RJF
| Private Client Group | $2.8B | 73% |
| Bank | $486.0M | 13% |
| Capital Markets | $464.0M | 12% |
| Other | $99.0M | 3% |
