vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $721.6M, roughly 1.2× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Celsius Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -35.7%, a 39.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
BIPC vs CELH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $721.6M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $24.7M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 117.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 231.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $721.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $725.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $739.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $329.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $402.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $355.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $99.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 52.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $398.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $676.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $806.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $615.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $890.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $903.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $879.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $676.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $870.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $871.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $443.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $399.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $423.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $415.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $338.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $-119.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-130.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -18.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -4.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $323.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-119.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $331.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $39.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $134.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $321.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
