vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and Chime Financial, Inc. (CHYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $543.5M, roughly 1.6× Chime Financial, Inc.). Chime Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -10.1% vs -35.7%, a 25.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Chime Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Chime Financial, Inc. is an American financial technology company based in San Francisco, California. It provides fee-free mobile banking services through two national banks, Stride Bank and The Bancorp Bank.
BIPC vs CHYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $543.5M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $-54.7M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | -11.9% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | -10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | -148.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $543.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $528.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $421.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $384.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $538.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $479.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $-923.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $385.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-154.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $842.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 87.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 86.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | 72.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 72.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | -176.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | 69.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 69.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | -174.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | -28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 175.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $445.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $445.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $868.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $270.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $295.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $356.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $512.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 23 | $-764.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-1.1B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $11.0B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $10.0B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $17.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $265.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $232.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-888.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIPC
Segment breakdown not available.
CHYM
| Payments Revenue | $363.2M | 67% |
| Platform Related Revenue | $180.4M | 33% |
