vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $866.0M, roughly 1.3× Brookfield Infrastructure Corp). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -35.7%, a 40.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.
BIPC vs EEFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $51.8M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 9.1% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $915.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $986.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $857.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.79× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $559.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $434.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 39.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 10.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $722.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $559.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $182.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $732.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $440.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $182.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $434.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $161.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $148.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $615.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $414.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 2.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
