vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and EPAM Systems (EPAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EPAM Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $866.0M, roughly 1.6× Brookfield Infrastructure Corp). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -35.7%, a 43.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
BIPC vs EPAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $109.4M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $73.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $282.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $268.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $612.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $282.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $294.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $53.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $242.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $129.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $286.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $114.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $123.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
