vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and GENESCO INC (GCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $616.2M, roughly 1.4× GENESCO INC). GENESCO INC runs the higher net margin — 0.9% vs -35.7%, a 36.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GENESCO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Genesco Inc. is an American publicly owned specialty retailer of branded footwear and accessories and is a wholesaler of branded and licensed footwear based in Nashville, Tennessee. Founded back in 1924 as Jarman Shoe Company, a footwear manufacturer, the company changed its name to General Shoe Corporation in 1933, and became a public company in 1939. By 1957, its stock would be included in the first S&P 500 Index. The company took its current name, Genesco—an acronym derived from its earlie...
BIPC vs GCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $616.2M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 46.8% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 1.4% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 128.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $616.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $546.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $474.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $745.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $596.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $457.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $739.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $-21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 47.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $27.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $89.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $513.8M |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $27.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $89.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $513.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $506.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $522.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $547.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $516.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $532.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $548.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $571.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $-12.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $23.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $86.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $-101.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $-33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $118.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-31.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-119.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-36.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-40.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $107.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIPC
Segment breakdown not available.
GCO
| Journeys Group Segment | $376.7M | 61% |
| Schuh Group Segment | $123.8M | 20% |
| Johnston And Murphy Group Segment | $81.2M | 13% |
| Genesco Brands Segment | $34.6M | 6% |
| Store Restructuring | $3.9M | 1% |
