vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and GRACO INC (GGG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $593.2M, roughly 1.5× GRACO INC). GRACO INC runs the higher net margin — 22.3% vs -35.7%, a 58.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRACO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Graco Inc. is an American industrial company that specializes in the development and manufacturing of fluid-handling systems and products. The company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and markets its products to customers worldwide.
BIPC vs GGG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $593.2M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $132.5M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 51.7% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 26.7% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 22.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 21.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $593.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $543.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $571.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $528.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $548.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $519.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $553.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $492.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $127.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $124.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $122.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 51.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | 54.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 54.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $624.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $624.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $618.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $534.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $536.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $675.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $764.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $666.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $622.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $196.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $184.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $637.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $179.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $182.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $125.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $185.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $178.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $139.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $118.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $184.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $163.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $114.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $81.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIPC
Segment breakdown not available.
GGG
| Industrial | $284.3M | 48% |
| Contractor | $265.5M | 45% |
| Other | $43.4M | 7% |
