vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.6× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -35.7%, a 65.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
BIPC vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $558.0M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $166.3M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | 37.2% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 23.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $500.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $119.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $19.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $294.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIPC
Segment breakdown not available.
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
