vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $665.5M, roughly 1.3× Natera, Inc.). Natera, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs -35.7%, a 42.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs -4.6%).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
BIPC vs NTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $665.5M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $47.3M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | 187.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $592.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $546.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $501.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $476.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $439.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | $413.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $367.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-87.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $-100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-66.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $-37.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-67.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $878.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $836.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $794.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $73.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $109.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
