vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp (BIPC) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($866.0M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.7× TIC Solutions, Inc.). TIC Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -9.3% vs -35.7%, a 26.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Canada, that engages in the acquisition and management of infrastructure assets on a global basis.
BIPC vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $866.0M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $-309.0M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 62.7% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -148.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $866.0M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $234.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $538.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $479.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-25.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-154.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $842.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 72.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 72.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.9% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 69.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 69.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 175.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $23.9B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $356.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $512.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $752.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-764.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.7B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $11.0B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $10.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $478.0M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $265.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $232.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BIPC
Segment breakdown not available.
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
