vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Baker Hughes (BKR) and RYDER SYSTEM INC (R). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RYDER SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.1B vs $6.6B, roughly 2.0× Baker Hughes). Baker Hughes runs the higher net margin — 14.1% vs 0.7%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Baker Hughes posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.5% vs 1.0%). RYDER SYSTEM INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($273.0M vs $210.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RYDER SYSTEM INC's revenue compounded faster (102.9% CAGR vs -3.9%).
Baker Hughes Company is an American global energy technology company co-headquartered in Houston, Texas and London, UK. As one of the world's largest oil field services, industrial and energy technology companies, it provides products and services to the oil and gas industry for exploration and production, as well as other energy and industrial applications. It operates in over 120 countries, with facilities in Australia, Brazil, Singapore, Malaysia, India, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Italy, Germany, ...
Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.
BKR vs R — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.6B | $13.1B |
| Net Profit | $930.0M | $93.0M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 14.1% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.5% | 1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 131.3% | -5.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $2.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | $930.0M | $93.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $876.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $609.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $701.0M | $131.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $402.0M | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $135.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $579.0M | $127.0M |
| Q1 26 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | 14.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | $2.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $14.8B | $182.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.5B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $50.9B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.83× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $14.8B | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $154.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $164.0M |
| Q1 26 | $16.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | $19.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $50.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.9B | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.7B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.1B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.4B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.5B | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7B | $16.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.29× | 2.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.34× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 2.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.38× | 2.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $583.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $210.0M | $273.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.3B | $595.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $583.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $749.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $929.0M | $442.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.0M | $752.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0M | $651.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $558.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $629.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.0M | $552.0M |
| Q1 26 | $210.0M | $273.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $409.0M | $137.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $-201.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $710.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.0M | $-87.0M |
| Q1 26 | 3.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | -2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.90× | 5.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.53× | 3.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 5.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.76× | 6.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.01× | 4.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.32× | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | 4.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
