vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BlackSky Technology Inc. (BKSY) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BlackSky Technology Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $20.2M, roughly 1.7× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). BlackSky Technology Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.5% vs -27.4%, a 24.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BlackSky Technology Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs 20.5%).
BlackSky Technology Inc. is a leading geospatial intelligence provider operating a constellation of high-revisit small Earth observation satellites. It delivers real-time satellite imagery, advanced data analytics, and dynamic monitoring solutions to government, defense, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients globally to support data-driven operational decision-making.
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
BKSY vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.2M | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $-868.0K | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | -2.5% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.5% | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.2M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-868.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.3M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.2M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.4M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -85.8% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -62.8% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -40.5% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.0% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.7% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.0% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.7% | -35.0% |
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -78.2% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -185.8% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.4% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.9% | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -55.8% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -65.2% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.44 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.27 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.61 | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.66 | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.88 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.5M | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $201.1M | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.9M | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $386.2M | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.12× | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $201.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.1M | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.5M | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.7M | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.8M | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.6M | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | $652.4K |
| Q4 25 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.8M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.7M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $386.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.9M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $310.8M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $254.1M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.5M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.1M | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.14× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.90× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.04× | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.3M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-538.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BKSY
Segment breakdown not available.
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
