vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BlackSky Technology Inc. (BKSY) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $35.2M, roughly 1.5× BlackSky Technology Inc.). BlackSky Technology Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.5% vs -106.3%, a 103.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BlackSky Technology Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, BlackSky Technology Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 0.4%).
BlackSky Technology Inc. is a leading geospatial intelligence provider operating a constellation of high-revisit small Earth observation satellites. It delivers real-time satellite imagery, advanced data analytics, and dynamic monitoring solutions to government, defense, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients globally to support data-driven operational decision-making.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
BKSY vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.2M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-868.0K | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -2.5% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.5% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.6M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.5M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.2M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-868.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.3M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.2M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.4M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.6M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -85.8% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -62.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -40.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.7% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -78.2% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -185.8% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.9% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -55.8% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -65.2% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.44 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.27 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.61 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.66 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.88 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $201.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.9M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $386.2M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $201.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.7M | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.1M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.6M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.8M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.3M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.7M | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $386.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $310.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $254.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.1M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.3M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-39.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.