vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BK Technologies Corp (BKTI) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BK Technologies Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.5M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.9× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, BK Technologies Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.0% vs 11.9%). BK Technologies Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.8M vs $589.0K). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -21.6%).
BK Technologies Corp designs, manufactures and sells analog and digital two-way radio communications equipment and related accessories. It serves public safety departments, first responders, government agencies and commercial clients primarily across North America, focusing on reliable, mission-critical communication solutions.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
BKTI vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.5M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $4.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 20.0% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.9% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.4% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.96 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.47 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.8M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $44.7M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $63.8M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.5M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.8M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $63.8M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.4M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.9M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.8M | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $18.4M | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.04× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.