vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BLACKBOXSTOCKS INC. (BLBX) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laser Photonics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.3K vs $628.4K, roughly 1.5× BLACKBOXSTOCKS INC.). BLACKBOXSTOCKS INC. runs the higher net margin — -255.8% vs -506.4%, a 250.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laser Photonics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs 7.4%). Over the past eight quarters, BLACKBOXSTOCKS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.6% CAGR vs -3.9%).
Blackboxstocks Inc. is a US-based fintech firm operating a subscription trading analytics platform for retail and active traders. It provides real-time market data, trade signals, analytical tools and social trading features for equity, options and digital asset markets, making institutional-grade trading resources accessible to individual users.
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
BLBX vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $628.4K | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 60.6% | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -248.0% | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -255.8% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.4% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -69.4% | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $628.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $697.0K | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $518.8K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $587.1K | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.8K | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $684.7K | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $649.4K | $743.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-720.6K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-829.1K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-948.7K | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-780.8K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-877.9K | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-863.7K | $-545.7K |
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.7% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.2% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.6% | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.7% | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.9% | 51.9% |
| Q4 25 | -248.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -63.0% | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -220.4% | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -151.2% | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -151.5% | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -113.3% | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -120.5% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -133.0% | -73.8% |
| Q4 25 | -255.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -103.4% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -244.7% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -141.2% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -162.2% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -120.5% | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.2% | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -133.0% | -73.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7M | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $8.7M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9K | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.0K | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | $13.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-510.4K | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-510.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-955.9K | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-643.7K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.4K | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8K | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-333.4K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-353.8K | $-866.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -136.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
