vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) and Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clearfield, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($34.3M vs $17.7M, roughly 1.9× Ballard Power Systems Inc.). Ballard Power Systems Inc. runs the higher net margin — 994.4% vs -1.8%, a 996.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell products for markets such as heavy-duty motive, portable power, material handling as well as engineering services. Ballard has designed and shipped over 400 MW of fuel cell products to date.
Clearfield, Inc. is a company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The company produces fiber optic products.
BLDP vs CLFD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.7M | $34.3M |
| Net Profit | $176.5M | $-614.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -5.3% |
| Net Margin | 994.4% | -1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 67.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-614.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.5M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-447.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 156.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -26.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 994.4% | -38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $96.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $249.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $268.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $96.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $117.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $113.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $142.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $249.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $256.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $264.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $265.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $275.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $274.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $279.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $314.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $310.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $303.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $315.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $318.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $315.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $654.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
