vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) and Connect Biopharma Holdings Ltd (CNTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Connect Biopharma Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.1M vs $17.7M, roughly 1.4× Ballard Power Systems Inc.). Ballard Power Systems Inc. runs the higher net margin — 994.4% vs 61.6%, a 932.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell products for markets such as heavy-duty motive, portable power, material handling as well as engineering services. Ballard has designed and shipped over 400 MW of fuel cell products to date.
Connect Biopharma Holdings Ltd is a clinical-stage global biopharmaceutical company dedicated to developing innovative targeted therapies for inflammatory, immunological and autoimmune diseases. Its core pipeline includes candidate treatments for asthma, atopic dermatitis and other conditions with high unmet medical needs, with main operations across the U.S., China and key global markets to deliver effective therapeutic solutions to patients.
BLDP vs CNTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.7M | $24.1M |
| Net Profit | $176.5M | $14.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 56.6% |
| Net Margin | 994.4% | 61.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 148.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 22 | $3.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-30.5M | ||
| Q1 22 | $-22.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 156.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 994.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | -659.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $110.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $110.9M |
| Total Assets | — | $120.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $110.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $81.6M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $128.7M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $144.1M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | -0.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-31.2M | ||
| Q1 22 | $-26.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.54× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
