vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) and Osisko Development Corp. (ODV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.7M vs $10.4M, roughly 1.7× Osisko Development Corp.).
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell products for markets such as heavy-duty motive, portable power, material handling as well as engineering services. Ballard has designed and shipped over 400 MW of fuel cell products to date.
Osisko Development Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development firm focused on high-grade gold and precious metal assets. It holds North American mineral projects, advancing them through exploration, feasibility study, and pre-production phases while adhering to sustainable mining standards.
BLDP vs ODV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.7M | $10.4M |
| Net Profit | $176.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -149.3% |
| Net Margin | 994.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.3M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 22 | $3.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-23.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-76.8M | ||
| Q1 22 | $-22.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 156.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -149.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -124.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -241.5% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -1940.8% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 994.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -108.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -1641.7% | ||
| Q1 22 | -659.1% | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $-26.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
