vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) and STAK Inc. (STAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.7M vs $13.6M, roughly 1.3× STAK Inc.). Ballard Power Systems Inc. runs the higher net margin — 994.4% vs 11.9%, a 982.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell products for markets such as heavy-duty motive, portable power, material handling as well as engineering services. Ballard has designed and shipped over 400 MW of fuel cell products to date.
BLDP vs STAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.7M | $13.6M |
| Net Profit | $176.5M | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.6% |
| Net Margin | 994.4% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.3M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $3.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $-22.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 156.5% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 994.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | -659.1% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $658.2K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $10.6M |
| Total Assets | — | $18.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $658.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-998.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | -0.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-998.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $-26.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BLDP
Segment breakdown not available.
STAK
| Other | $4.2M | 31% |
| Sales of specialized oilfield equipment | $4.0M | 30% |
| Total | $3.3M | 24% |
| Sales of specialized oilfield vehicle | $2.1M | 15% |
| Service income from automation solutions | $26.4K | 0% |
