vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) and Americas Gold & Silver Corp (USAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Americas Gold & Silver Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.1M vs $17.7M, roughly 1.1× Ballard Power Systems Inc.). Ballard Power Systems Inc. runs the higher net margin — 994.4% vs -82.3%, a 1076.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ballard Power Systems Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell products for markets such as heavy-duty motive, portable power, material handling as well as engineering services. Ballard has designed and shipped over 400 MW of fuel cell products to date.
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
BLDP vs USAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.7M | $19.1M |
| Net Profit | $176.5M | $-15.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 994.4% | -82.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -28.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.3M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 22 | $3.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $176.5M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 22 | $-22.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 156.5% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 994.4% | -82.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -60.9% | ||
| Q1 22 | -659.1% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $39.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $50.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $234.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $234.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-12.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -216.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 150.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 22 | $-26.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-41.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -216.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -42.2% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 150.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.