vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (BMNR) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.0M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.8× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -34583.9%, a 34642.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (627.6% vs -16.4%).
Bitmine Immersion Technologies is a tech firm focused on developing and providing professional immersion cooling solutions for high-performance computing scenarios, including cryptocurrency mining rig clusters and data center infrastructure. Its products boost hardware operating efficiency, cut energy consumption for heat control, extend high-power computing equipment lifespan, and help clients reduce long-term operational costs.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
BMNR vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.0M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8B | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -34784.7% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -34583.9% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 627.6% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -330212.5% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-8.40 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $682.4K | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-622.8K | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-974.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-654.2K | — |
| Q1 26 | 87.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | -34784.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -238564.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.8% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.2% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -73.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -43.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | -34583.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -226955.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -76.2% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -81.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -53.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-8.40 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.98 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.66 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $879.6M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.9B | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $879.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $887.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $483.0K | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $797.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-88.2M | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-88.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-228.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.0K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-96.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-42.7K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-228.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-114.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-106.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.3K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -9975.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BMNR
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
