vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (BMNR) and Research Solutions, Inc. (RSSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Research Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.8M vs $11.0M, roughly 1.1× BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Research Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.6% vs -34583.9%, a 34588.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (627.6% vs -1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (251.9% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Bitmine Immersion Technologies is a tech firm focused on developing and providing professional immersion cooling solutions for high-performance computing scenarios, including cryptocurrency mining rig clusters and data center infrastructure. Its products boost hardware operating efficiency, cut energy consumption for heat control, extend high-power computing equipment lifespan, and help clients reduce long-term operational costs.
Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No. 1 on both Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top 500 Design Firms and Trenchless Technolo...
BMNR vs RSSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.0M | $11.8M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8B | $546.9K |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | -34784.7% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | -34583.9% | 4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 627.6% | -1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -330212.5% | 127.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-8.40 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $682.4K | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $12.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.2B | $546.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $749.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-622.8K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $216.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-974.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $669.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-654.2K | $-2.8M |
| Q1 26 | 87.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.3% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 51.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.1% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 46.5% |
| Q1 26 | -34784.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -238564.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -73.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -43.6% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | -34583.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -226955.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -76.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -81.1% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -53.4% | -23.3% |
| Q1 26 | $-8.40 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.98 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.66 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $879.6M | $12.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.9B | $17.2M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $44.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $879.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $887.7M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $483.0K | $9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $797.3K | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0K | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1M |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.3B | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $11.7M |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $45.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $41.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-88.2M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-88.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-228.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.0K | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-96.0K | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.0K | $843.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-42.7K | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-228.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-114.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-106.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.3K | $1.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -9975.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BMNR
Segment breakdown not available.
RSSS
| Transactions | $6.6M | 56% |
| Platforms | $5.2M | 44% |
