vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brand Engagement Network Inc. (BNAI) and Sharps Technology Inc. (STSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sharps Technology Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.6K vs $60.1K, roughly 1.4× Brand Engagement Network Inc.). Brand Engagement Network Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4128.4% vs -125963.6%, a 121835.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sharps Technology Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (217.9% vs 20.2%).
Blackhawk Network Holdings Inc. is an American privately held company that operates in the prepaid, gift card and payments industries. It sells branded physical and digital gifts, phones, prepaid debit, and incentives cards online and through a network of global retailers. Blackhawk's network reaches people through a number of different channels including in-store, online, mobile, and incentive. Blackhawk headquarters are in Pleasanton, California and the company was incorporated in 2006.
Sharps Rifle Manufacturing Company was the manufacturer of the Sharps Rifle. The company was organized by Samuel Robbins and Richard S. Lawrence as a holding company in Hartford, Connecticut, on October 9, 1851 with $100,000 in capital. Despite Sharps departing from the company bearing his name, Sharps Rifle Manufacturing Company produced over 100,000 rifles, but it dissolved in 1881 with the widespread use of repeating rifles.
BNAI vs STSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $60.1K | $83.6K |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-105.3M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | -1398.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3853.3% | -122747.9% |
| Net Margin | -4128.4% | -125963.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 217.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.4% | -6151.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-4.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $60.1K | $83.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $222.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0K | $-627.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $5.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.8K | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $43.6K |
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $-105.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.9M | $-982.4K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-3.1M |
| Q3 25 | 100.0% | -1398.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -463.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -3853.3% | -122747.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1349.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41540.9% | 322.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10559.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -36329.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13654.9% | -9693.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -6688.9% |
| Q3 25 | -4128.4% | -125963.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1598.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36102.3% | -307.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11646.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -39756.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13826.9% | -5164.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -7109.4% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-4.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $38.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-643.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.27 | $-347.50 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-12.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $102.7K | $10.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5M | $433.2M |
| Total Assets | $16.4M | $444.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $102.7K | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $236.2K | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.0M |
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $433.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.9M |
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | $444.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.1M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.9M | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $11.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-107.3K | $-7.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -10559.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1724.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-16.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-107.3K | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-2.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -10559.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1694.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 405.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6159.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31313.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9164.4% | -9946.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1724.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 839.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | -14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 312.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
