vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sharps Technology Inc. (STSS) and Catheter Precision, Inc. (VTAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Catheter Precision, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($238.0K vs $83.6K, roughly 2.8× Sharps Technology Inc.). Catheter Precision, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2427.7% vs -125963.6%, a 123535.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sharps Technology Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (217.9% vs 59.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Catheter Precision, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (70.4% CAGR vs 44.4%).
Sharps Rifle Manufacturing Company was the manufacturer of the Sharps Rifle. The company was organized by Samuel Robbins and Richard S. Lawrence as a holding company in Hartford, Connecticut, on October 9, 1851 with $100,000 in capital. Despite Sharps departing from the company bearing his name, Sharps Rifle Manufacturing Company produced over 100,000 rifles, but it dissolved in 1881 with the widespread use of repeating rifles.
Namiki Precision Jewel Co., Ltd. is a Japanese component manufacturing company based in Tokyo, Japan. The company was founded in 1939 as a manufacturer of synthetic sapphire jewel bearings for electrical measuring instruments. Namiki supplies industrial jewel parts, dc coreless and dc brushless motors, multi-functional vibration components, precision gearheads, medical equipment, watch exterior parts, Analog Record-related Products and other precision components. Namiki merged with its affil...
STSS vs VTAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.6K | $238.0K |
| Net Profit | $-105.3M | $-5.8M |
| Gross Margin | -1398.7% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -122747.9% | -4143.3% |
| Net Margin | -125963.6% | -2427.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 217.9% | 59.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6151.0% | -2.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $238.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6K | $226.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $222.7K | $212.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-627.0K | $143.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $149.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3K | $93.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0K | $82.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-982.4K | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1398.7% | 92.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -463.4% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 92.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 92.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 93.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4143.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -122747.9% | -1336.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1349.8% | -2210.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 322.5% | -2500.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2047.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2978.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36329.4% | -2921.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9693.8% | -3190.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2427.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -125963.6% | -996.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1598.1% | -2409.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -307.6% | -2828.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3777.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4291.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -39756.6% | -4537.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5164.2% | -3262.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.62 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-643.64 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-347.50 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.5M | $88.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $433.2M | $7.1M |
| Total Assets | $444.0M | $15.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $88.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $838.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $450.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $16.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.0M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $25.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.8M | $28.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.4M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10559.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1724.5% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10559.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1694.8% | -1070.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 405.3% | -1642.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -31313.6% | -1873.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9946.7% | -2395.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1724.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 839.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 312.1% | 48.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.0% | 26.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
