vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BONK, INC. (BNKK) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laser Photonics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.3K vs $515.4K, roughly 1.8× BONK, INC.). Laser Photonics Corp runs the higher net margin — -506.4% vs -8274.9%, a 7768.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BONK, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (278.2% vs 28.3%). Over the past eight quarters, BONK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (73.8% CAGR vs -3.9%).
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
BNKK vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $515.4K | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-42.7M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -8274.9% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 278.2% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -215.2% | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $515.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.9K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.1K | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-289.2K | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.2K | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $710.2K | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.7K | $743.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-42.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.7M | $-545.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.1% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.9% | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -73.8% |
| Q4 25 | -8274.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2216.8% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29756.5% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12652.7% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4678.7% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10823.8% | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1165.0% | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9180.9% | -73.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.07 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.33 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $54.7K | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.0M | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $41.0M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.7K | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.7K | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.7K | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.7K | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.7K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $242.6K | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-542.6K | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2M | $13.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.1M | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.4M | $-866.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -136.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
