vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL) and HACKETT GROUP, INC. (HCKT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($121.4M vs $75.8M, roughly 1.6× HACKETT GROUP, INC.). Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 38.2% vs 7.4%, a 30.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs -4.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns, and manages a diversified portfolio of single-tenant commercial real estate assets across the United States. Its portfolio covers key segments including industrial facilities, healthcare properties, retail locations, and office spaces, all leased to tenants under long-term net lease agreements.
Hackett Limited is a British multi-channel retailer of clothing for men and boys, with a broad range of apparel and accessories. It was founded in 1983 in London, England. As of June 2019, the company had 160 stores globally, with its flagship store at 14 Savile Row in London. It is owned by both Lebanese holding company M1 Group and American L Capital Asia
BNL vs HCKT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $121.4M | $75.8M |
| Net Profit | $46.4M | $5.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | 52.2% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 38.2% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | -4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 56.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $121.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $118.3M | $75.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.2M | $73.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.0M | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.7M | $77.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.1M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.4M | $79.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.9M | $77.7M |
| Q1 26 | $46.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.3M | $8.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.5% |
| Q1 26 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.4% | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.17 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.3M | $18.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $68.1M |
| Total Assets | $5.8B | $206.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $19.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $101.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $114.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $115.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $102.2M |
| Q1 26 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $206.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $200.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $200.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $191.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $193.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $190.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $187.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $299.5M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.5M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.3M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.2M | $13.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $269.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | $12.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 228.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 231.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.9% | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.04× | 3.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.43× | 4.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.93× | 3.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.27× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.47× | 5.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.10× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BNL
Segment breakdown not available.
HCKT
| Global S And BT | $39.1M | 52% |
| Sap Solutions | $22.4M | 30% |
| Consulting And Software Support And Maintenance | $14.3M | 19% |
