vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL) and Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $121.4M, roughly 1.2× Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.).
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns, and manages a diversified portfolio of single-tenant commercial real estate assets across the United States. Its portfolio covers key segments including industrial facilities, healthcare properties, retail locations, and office spaces, all leased to tenants under long-term net lease agreements.
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
BNL vs LANV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $121.4M | $144.1M |
| Net Profit | $46.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 52.2% | -60.5% |
| Net Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $121.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $118.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.0M | $144.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.9M | $184.7M |
| Q1 26 | $46.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.5% |
| Q1 26 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.0% |
| Q1 26 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.3M | $32.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $290.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $-116.4M |
| Total Assets | $5.8B | $632.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $19.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $290.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $136.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $-116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $100.1M |
| Q1 26 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $632.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $731.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | 1.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-75.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $299.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $-75.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.2M | $-36.2K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $269.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 228.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 231.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.93× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.10× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.