vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. (BNT) and Trane Technologies (TT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trane Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.0B vs $3.0B, roughly 1.6× Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd.). Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 11.9%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trane Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.0% vs 4.7%).
Brookfield Corporation is a Canadian multinational company that is one of the world's largest alternative investment management companies. It has over US$1 trillion of assets under management, much of which is workers’ deferred income from global public pension funds. It focuses on direct control investments in real estate, renewable power, infrastructure, credit and private equity. The company invests in distressed securities through Oaktree Capital, which it bought in 2019. Brookfield Corp...
Trane Technologies plc is an Irish domiciled company focused on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration systems. The company traces its corporate history back more than 150 years and was created after a series of mergers and spin-offs. In 2008, HVAC manufacturer Trane was acquired by Ingersoll Rand, a US industrial tools manufacturer. In 2020, the tools business was spun off as Ingersoll Rand and the remaining company was renamed Trane Technologies.
BNT vs TT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $5.0B |
| Net Profit | $516.0M | $589.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 165.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.0% | 15.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 91.8% | -3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $589.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $591.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $516.0M | $874.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $604.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $604.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $772.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.0M | $755.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 165.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 14.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.5B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.8B | $8.6B |
| Total Assets | $148.9B | $22.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.9B | $21.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $130.5B | $20.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $573.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $692.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $339.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $899.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $695.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $573.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $935.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $602.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $220.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $774.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.92× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BNT
Segment breakdown not available.
TT
| Americas | $4.0B | 80% |
| EMEA | $639.5M | 13% |
| Asia Pacific | $331.5M | 7% |
