vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.7M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.1× DMC Global Inc.). GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -7.8%, a 11.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
BOOM vs GILT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $152.7M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $6.3M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $57016808.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $126.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $57016808.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $56622204.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $64.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | $56.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $315.8M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $575.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $93.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $315.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $282.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $575.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $416.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
GILT
Segment breakdown not available.
