vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DMC Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.2× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -7.8%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -5.8%). DMC Global Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.6M vs $9.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
BOOM vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.
