vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $222.8M, roughly 1.2× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 13.1%, a 640.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
BORR vs CATY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $222.8M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $90.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 653.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 12.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $196.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $187.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $186.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $189.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $178.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $175.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $90.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $71.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 49.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 653.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 587.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $119.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $24.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $119.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $368.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $363.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 163.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 4.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $672.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $368.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $81.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $88.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $325.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 163.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 174.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 49.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
CATY
Segment breakdown not available.
