vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Citi Trends Inc (CTRN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.4× Citi Trends Inc). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs -3.5%, a 16.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
BORR vs CTRN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $197.1M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $-6.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | -3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 10.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 3.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $-0.86 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $190.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $211.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $215.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $871.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.86 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $107.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $464.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $113.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $113.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $154.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $464.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $457.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $437.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $462.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $467.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $506.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $484.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $518.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $8.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $767.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $11.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $767.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | -12.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
