vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Dayforce (DAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dayforce is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($481.6M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.8× Borr Drilling Ltd). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs -40.9%, a 54.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dayforce posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.5% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Dayforce, Inc., formerly Ceridian, is an American human resources software and services company.
BORR vs DAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $481.6M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $-196.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | -40.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 9.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | -9940.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $481.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $464.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $481.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $465.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $440.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $423.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $431.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $399.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-196.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $45.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 42.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 9.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 11.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $627.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $631.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $627.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $625.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $557.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $494.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $465.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $392.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $570.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | $631.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $631.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $632.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $9.0B |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.50× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $31.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $31.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $112.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $91.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $89.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 5.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
DAY
| Dayforce Recurring | $333.0M | 69% |
| Cloud And Bureau Professional Services And Other | $78.5M | 16% |
| Float | $42.2M | 9% |
| Powerpay Recurring | $19.7M | 4% |
| Other Recurring | $8.2M | 2% |
