vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and KFORCE INC (KFRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KFORCE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($330.4M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.2× Borr Drilling Ltd). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 2.4%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KFORCE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Kforce Inc. is a professional staffing and solutions firm headquartered in the United States. It provides skilled professional placements and specialized workforce solutions primarily across technology, finance & accounting, and healthcare segments, serving a wide range of mid-sized to large enterprise clients nationwide.
BORR vs KFRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $330.4M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $7.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 2.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | -2.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $330.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $332.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $332.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $334.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $343.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $353.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $356.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $117.4M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $384.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $444.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $349.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $127.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $110.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | $117.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $124.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $132.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $134.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $154.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $166.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $384.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $365.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $374.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $373.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $368.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $369.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $362.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $43.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $249.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $20.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
KFRC
Segment breakdown not available.
